After indulging in my weekly dose of podcasts (yes, another podcast breakdown… I’m sorry!) something I found that really resonated with me was Sam Harris’s conversation with Twitter CEO, Jack Dorsey. The pair discussed all things from meditation and Donald Trump to the company’s future objectives on bettering its privacy policy and data concerns.
What happened at the 32-minute mark kindled my procrastination pit of fire! #lit

Dorsey went into detail about Twitter’s “more abstract” ambitions, conversing about the improvements and the ability to measure the health of conversation that arises on the social networking platform. How? Through four identified health-indicators…
1. Shared attention is what percentage of conversation is attentive to the same thing.
2. Shared reality being the percentage of the conversation are sharing the same facts.
3. Receptivity measuring the toxicity and people’s desire to walk away from something.
4. Variety of perspective.
CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey
It appears that Twitters grand ambition is to monitor conversation, but their motivation is veiled behind the good intent of monitoring their user’s well-being. Could it perhaps be a hidden agenda? Monitoring behaviours to predict and prevent negative behaviours from happening. Or another means of accessing more information?[

The Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal and an evident rise in “doxing”, have us witnessing social media organisations step closer towards censorship and data monitoring where users’ every tweet, every post, and every search will be recorded and tracked!
A paper by (Gandomi & Haider 2015), Beyond the hype:Big data concepts, methods, and analytics dissected the immediate preconceptions of what defines big data as well as suggesting various tools to analyse unstructured data.
In relation to the Making Sense with Sam Harris podcast, what really struck me were the analytical techniques of text, especially “document-level techniques” which recognise and determine whether a certain document communicates a negative or positive sentiment.

Food for thought: If this is the pathway we’re heading down, doesn’t this leap breach our right to privacy? And, do we care enough about our digital footprint to prevent these large social media organisations and brands from exercising their full control?
Enlighten me with your thoughts. Let’s pick our brains together.
Yours truly.







